Concerns regarding evaluation criteria of Descriptive answers

As the participant we all have the complete right to know the following things about descriptive round
These details should be made public before the results and transparency should be maintained -

1. Judging Criteria:

What specific criteria are being used to evaluate our descriptive answers?

Are there predetermined rubrics or scoring systems in place to ensure uniform judgment across all teams?

How much weight is given to technical accuracy, creativity, and presentation in our answers?

2. Comparison with Winning Teams:

What made the winning teams' answers stand out compared to the non-selected teams?

Can examples or key characteristics of winning answers be shared to help us understand the standard?

Were there common mistakes that led to lower scores for other teams, and can those be highlighted?

3. Selection Transparency:

Can the final scores or rankings for all teams be made available to ensure transparency?

Were external judges or experts involved in reviewing the answers, or was the judgment entirely internal?